SX0T - WHAMBURGED AND HENCHCRIED

mikekarnell:

stayforthecredits:

This is an excerpt from There Will Be Blood (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2007). 11 adult viewers were shown the video and their eye movements recorded using an Eyelink 1000 (SR Research) infra-red camera-based eyetracker. Each dot represents the center of one viewer’s gaze. The size of each dot represents the length of time they have held fixation.

A fascinating post by Tim Smith, a psychological researcher interested in how viewers watch films can be read here. Here is an excerpt:

The most striking feature of the gaze behaviour when it is animated in this way is the very fast pace at which we shift our eyes around the screen. On average, each fixation is about 300 milliseconds in duration. (A millisecond is a thousandth of a second.) Amazingly, that means that each fixation of the fovea lasts only about 1/3 of a second. These fixations are separated by even briefer saccadic eye movements, taking between 15 and 30 milliseconds!

Looking at these patterns, our gaze may appear unusually busy and erratic, but we’re moving our eyes like this every moment of our waking lives. We are not aware of the frenetic pace of our attention because we are effectively blind every time we saccade between locations. This process is known as saccadic suppression. Our visual system automatically stitches together the information encoded during each fixation to effortlessly create the perception of a constant, stable scene.

In other experiments with static scenes, my colleagues and I have shown that even if the overall scene is hidden 150milliseconds into every fixation, we are still able to move our eyes around and find a desired object. Our visual system is built to deal with such disruptions and perceive a coherent world from fragments of information encoded during each fixation.

The second most striking observation you may have about the video is how coordinated the gaze of multiple viewers is. Most of the time, all viewers are looking in a similar place. This is a phenomenon I have termed Attentional Synchrony. If several viewers examine a static scene like the Repin painting discussed in David’s last post, they will look in similar places, but not at the same time. Yet as soon as the image moves, we get a high degree of attentional synchrony. Something about the dynamics of a moving scene leads to all viewers looking at the same place, at the same time.

This six minute video taught me more than that film school I never attended ever could. Science and the internet prevail again.

Amazing stuff here. Intelligence For. The. Win.

  1. lifestudio reblogged this from pluimer
  2. oscardewinter reblogged this from reductionismandthebeast
  3. sarahtremayne reblogged this from stayforthecredits
  4. slurpit reblogged this from peterwknox
  5. igiselle reblogged this from peterwknox
  6. sx0t reblogged this from mikekarnell and added:
    Amazing stuff here. Intelligence For. The. Win.
  7. reductionismandthebeast reblogged this from occono
  8. stevewyshywaniuk reblogged this from stayforthecredits
  9. occono reblogged this from getoffmyblog
  10. getoffmyblog reblogged this from pluimer
  11. thepatrickproject reblogged this from stayforthecredits
  12. heyhilaryous reblogged this from stayforthecredits
  13. pluimer reblogged this from mikekarnell
  14. kayfabe reblogged this from peterwknox
  15. crackerbarrel reblogged this from stayforthecredits
  16. peterwknox reblogged this from mikekarnell
  17. whitehatter reblogged this from stayforthecredits
  18. i-know-your-name-jackass reblogged this from stayforthecredits
  19. mikekarnell reblogged this from stayforthecredits and added:
    This six minute video taught me more than that film school I never attended ever could. Science and the internet prevail...
  20. stayforthecredits posted this